# Findigs: Features, Pricing, Integrations & AI Visibility

> Findigs reviewed: application-to-decision screening with AI underwriting against your risk policy, unpublished pricing, no named PMS, and what to ask.

Canonical: https://webpossible.com/vendors/findigs/
Source: https://webpossible.com/vendors/findigs/
Format: Markdown version for AI agents. The canonical HTML page is at the source URL above.
Last verified: 2026-09-04

---

Vendor profile · verified 2026-09-04

# Findigs: Features, Pricing, Integrations & AI Visibility

By Ryan York · last verified 2026-09-04

## On the record

From the shared vendor database. Every fact carries its source and the date it was checked; anything not listed here is a question for the vendor.

Category

[Tenant Screening](/property-management-software/tenant-screening/)

What it is · [source](https://www.findigs.com/) · verified 2026-09-04

Rental application and decisioning platform combining identity, income and employment verification, document fraud detection and AI underwriting against the operator's risk policy to auto-approve or deny.

Pricing model

Not published; ask for the per-unit figure and the minimum.

PMS integrations · [source](https://www.findigs.com/integrations) · verified 2026-09-04

Not published; ask which PMS marketplaces list it.

Property types and portfolio fit

Institutional Multifamily, Single-Family Rental, Student Housing, Affordable Housing

Website

[https://www.findigs.com/](https://www.findigs.com/)

Findigs is a rental application and decisioning platform. The record describes identity, income and employment verification, document fraud detection, and AI underwriting against the operator’s own risk policy that auto-approves or denies the application. Where most of the [tenant screening category](/property-management-software/tenant-screening/) sells either the report or the verification, Findigs sells the decision, and its homepage quotes a customer whose approvals dropped from three or four days to five hours. The research notes add SOC 2 Type II and FCRA to its own description. The facts panel below is rendered from the vendor database with a source and verification date on each entry.

## Who it fits

The record carries the widest segment tag in the category: institutional multifamily, single-family rental, student housing and affordable housing, and the research notes add build-to-rent and name Sentral, Evernest, McKinley and Western Wealth as customers. The common thread is an operator with enough applications that the leasing agent reading a PDF is the bottleneck, and with a written risk policy that can be turned into rules. Findigs fits when the policy exists and the goal is to have most applications resolve without a person touching them.

It fits less well when the policy does not exist yet, because AI underwriting against a custom policy needs one to underwrite against, and writing it is the operator’s job before the demo, with counsel. It does not fit the independent landlord ordering one report at a time; there is no published price and no per-report purchase in the record.

## Pricing

Pricing is not published. Ask for the per-applicant or per-unit rate, the monthly minimum, the contract term, whether you pay for applications that never complete, and whether identity, income, document and underwriting are one bundle or separate line items. Then price a year at your application volume rather than your unit count.

## Integrations

The record lists no PMS. Findigs’ own integrations page describes native integrations without naming a system, so the database entry is empty by design and this is the first question to settle. Ask which property management systems it connects to today, which direction the data moves, whether the decision writes back to the application record, and which of its named customers run on the system you run. The category guide lists which of the other vendors name Yardi, RealPage, Entrata, Rent Manager and AppFolio, and none of them can be assumed for Findigs until it says so.

## Limitations and questions to ask

Automated denial is the feature and the risk. Ask to see the policy editor, then ask how a criminal-record rule is filtered for each jurisdiction you operate in, who maintains that filter, and how a record that should have been excluded is caught before it drives a denial. Ask who issues the adverse-action notice when the system denies, what reason it states, how an applicant disputes it, and how the product documents that every applicant was held to the same criteria. Get the written criteria in front of counsel before any automated denial is switched on.

Then the queue. Every decisioning product has a set of applications that did not resolve automatically, and that set is your staffing cost. Ask for the share of applications that go to manual review on a portfolio like yours and what the reviewer sees. Ask what the five-hour figure on the homepage measures, from which event to which, and whether it includes applications that went to a person.

Then the two verification paths. Document fraud detection examines the uploaded file; income and employment verification may read from a payroll or bank source. Ask which an applicant meets first, what triggers the fallback, what happens when the applicant refuses to link an account, and what the completion rate is on an applicant mix like yours. Ask how a thin-file applicant with income but no credit history is scored under a policy, since that is the case the operators in our research improvise around with a double deposit.

## Alternatives

The [full tenant screening vendor list](/property-management-software/tenant-screening/vendors/) compares all nine vendors with the same facts. The closest alternative is [VERO](/vendors/vero/), the other application-to-decision platform, which lists Yardi, Entrata, RealPage and Rent Manager and adds deposit alternative, loss-of-employment and guarantor products to the screening result. An operator who wants to keep the PMS module’s report and add only the fraud check should look at [Snappt](/vendors/snappt/) for documents or [Payscore](/vendors/payscore/) for source-verified income.

## AI visibility

The AI Shortlist Index will measure tenant screening when a prompt set for the category is approved, and the Findigs row will appear here from that edition on.

## Live from the Index, September 2026

This vendor is not in an Index category yet.

Part of [/property-management-software/tenant-screening/](/property-management-software/tenant-screening/).
