Vendor profile · verified 2026-09-04
ChargePoint: Features, Pricing, Integrations & AI Visibility
On the record
From the shared vendor database. Every fact carries its source and the date it was checked; anything not listed here is a question for the vendor.
- Category
- EV Charging for Multifamily
- What it is · source · verified 2026-09-05
- Networked Level 2 (CPF50, CT4000) and DC fast stations for apartments with per-resident energy billing, pricing by energy, time or driver group, Power Sharing load management and access control; 98% uptime guarantee.
- Pricing model
- Not published; ask for the per-unit figure and the minimum.
- PMS integrations · source · verified 2026-09-05
- Not published; ask which PMS marketplaces list it.
- Property types and portfolio fit
- Institutional Multifamily
- Website
- https://www.chargepoint.com/
ChargePoint sells its networked charging stack to apartments the way it sells it everywhere else. The apartments page pairs two Level 2 stations, the CPF50 for assigned and community parking and the CT4000 for mixed-use and public spaces, with DC fast charging where a property wants it. The ChargePoint Platform prices sessions by energy cost, duration, time of use, session length or driver group, bills each resident for the energy they used, shares power across stations, and controls access by driver, station or time. The page claims over 40 integrations with building and energy management systems and a 98 percent uptime guarantee. It is the one public charging network in the multifamily EV charging category that sells into apartments as a platform rather than as a multifamily specialist. The facts panel below is rendered from our vendor database with a source and verification date on each entry.
Who it fits
The database tags institutional multifamily. The buyer ChargePoint’s page describes is an owner who wants residents to use the same app and account they use at the office and the grocery store, who has mixed-use or visitor parking as well as assigned spaces, and who may want a public-facing station on the same platform. The page’s own demand number, that 27 percent of residents are interested in charging stations, is written for an asset manager building a case rather than a site team fielding requests.
An owner who wants one vendor to own the whole project is a less natural fit, since ChargePoint’s page offers a choice: the property can self-install and maintain, or buy ChargePoint’s deployment and support services. That flexibility is a feature for a portfolio with in-house facilities staff and a burden for one without.
Pricing
Pricing is not published. The model on the page is hardware plus platform, with the property choosing between doing its own installation and maintenance or buying ChargePoint’s services, and the property setting the resident rate by any of the five pricing bases. Ask for the hardware price per port for the CPF50 and the CT4000, the platform subscription per port per year, the transaction fee on resident sessions, the price of the deployment and support services if you buy them, the cost of the plan that carries the 98 percent guarantee, and the contract term. Ask what the per-resident billing pays out to the property and on what schedule.
Integrations
The database records no property management system integration, and none is named on the apartments page. What the page names is over 40 integrations with building and energy management systems, and Power Sharing is the load-management feature that uses them. So the integration question splits in two. On the energy side, ask which building systems the 40 include and which apply to a garage with no solar or storage. On the resident side, ask whether per-resident billing can post to your ledger through a connector, whether a usage file per resident can be exported for your PMS, and whether access by driver group can be driven by your rent roll so a move-out closes the account. The list of EV charging vendors shows no vendor in the category claiming PMS sync on a fetched page, so the question is the same for every demo.
Limitations and questions to ask
Power Sharing is the first thing to test. Ask how many CPF50 ports the platform will run on your service size, what a resident gets at 7 a.m. after a night on a full garage, and whether priority can be set by driver group. Ask what the 98 percent uptime guarantee measures, what is paid when it is missed and whether it covers a self-maintained site or only one on ChargePoint’s support plan. On access, ask how the driver-group controls handle a resident who moves out, a guest, and a public driver on the CT4000, and how the pricing differs for each. Ask how idle time is charged in assigned parking, where a resident may leave a car plugged in overnight by design. Ask whether the CPF50 and CT4000 can run on another network if you leave, and what that costs.
Alternatives
The vendor list linked above compares all twelve with the same facts. If you want per-resident billing by energy, time or driver group on chargers you already own or would rather choose yourself, AmpUp runs OCPP hardware from an approved-manufacturer list with metered, amenity or hybrid pricing. If the electrical ceiling is the whole problem, PowerFlex leads with Adaptive Load Management and publishes its savings claim on the avoided service upgrade.
AI visibility
The AI Shortlist Index will measure EV charging for multifamily when a prompt set for the category is approved, and the ChargePoint row will appear here from that edition on.
Live from the Index, September 2026
This vendor is not in an Index category yet.
Part of /property-management-software/ev-charging-for-multifamily/.