Vendor profile · verified 2026-09-04
LeaseLock: Features, Pricing, Integrations & AI Visibility
On the record
From the shared vendor database. Every fact carries its source and the date it was checked; anything not listed here is a question for the vendor.
- Category
- Security Deposit Alternatives
- What it is · source · verified 2026-09-05
- Lease insurance (Zero Deposit) that replaces the cash security deposit and covers the owner's losses; Dallas-based, sold to multifamily and SFR portfolio owners with named clients including Tricon and Starlight.
- Pricing model
- Not published; ask for the per-unit figure and the minimum.
- PMS integrations · source · verified 2026-09-05
- Not published; ask which PMS marketplaces list it.
- Property types and portfolio fit
- Institutional Multifamily, Single-Family Rental
- Also known as
- Zero Deposit, LeaseLock Zero Deposit
- Website
- https://leaselock.com/
LeaseLock sells lease insurance, branded Zero Deposit, that replaces the cash security deposit and covers the owner’s losses. The record puts it in Dallas, notes a Texas insurance license, and names Tricon, RLDC and Starlight as clients. Within the deposit alternatives category it is the one vendor in the lease insurance bucket of the taxonomy managers use: the owner holds an insurance policy that pays a covered loss, as opposed to a surety bond the resident buys or a payment method the resident leaves on file. Its own site describes the benefit as reducing carrying costs and vacancy loss, which is vendor framing for lease-up speed.
Who it fits
The record tags institutional multifamily and SFR, and the client names are portfolio owners at scale, including a large single-family operator. The buyer is an owner or operator whose leasing problem is move-in cost and whose accounting can treat a claim payment from an insurer the way it treats any other receivable. A community that advertises a $0 deposit is the use case, and LeaseLock’s site claims that 91 percent of residents prefer such a community; that figure is the vendor’s, so ask for the survey behind it.
It fits less well for a small manager who needs the product to appear inside AppFolio, Buildium or Rent Manager, because the record names no integration with any of them. That buyer should read Obligo’s profile, which names all three. It also fits less well for the manager who wants the resident, rather than the property, to be the policyholder, since lease insurance is the owner’s policy.
Pricing
Pricing is not published; the site sends you to a demo. Ask for the resident’s monthly or one-time cost, the property’s cost per unit or per enrolled lease, the coverage cap per unit for damage and for unpaid rent, and the contract term. Ask whether the property or the resident is the named insured and who pays the premium in each of the enrollment options. Then price the resident’s total premium over an average tenancy beside the deposit you would have collected, because the premium is non-refundable and does not count toward any loss the resident later owes.
Integrations
The record carries an empty integrations list sourced from LeaseLock’s how-it-works page, which claims full integration with all major PMS systems without naming one. The integrations page we tried returned an error. For an institutional operator that means asking for Yardi, RealPage and Entrata by name, and asking whether enrollment, premium billing and claim payments post to the resident ledger or arrive as a monthly report. The complete vendor table for the category shows which competitors name a system and which do not.
Limitations and questions to ask
Start with the policy. Ask for the specimen policy and the state filings, which states it is offered in, and who the carrier is. Texas is the one license the record names; ask about every other state in your portfolio. Ask what is excluded, what the per-claim and per-lease caps are, and how a dispute with the resident over a charge is handled before the claim is filed.
Then the resident. Ask what the resident is told at signing, in which document, whether the resident can choose the cash deposit instead, and which state deposit-law protections the resident gives up. Ask which applicants qualify and what the decline rule is, because the ones who do not qualify pay a cash deposit and your leasing team then runs two tracks.
Then the owner’s question. With no cash at stake, what is the resident’s incentive to leave the unit clean and pay the last month? Ask for claim frequency at communities like yours, and ask who pursues the resident after the claim pays and in whose name.
Alternatives
The other insurance-shaped product in the category is Rhino’s deposit insurance, where the resident rather than the owner buys the policy. The bond-shaped product is TheGuarantors’ security deposit replacement. A manager who wants no insurance at all and a refund-at-move-out model should look at Obligo, and a manager whose real problem is administering the cash deposit should look at Qira.
AI visibility
The Index will measure security deposit alternatives when a prompt set is approved, and this profile carries no number until then.
Live from the Index, September 2026
This vendor is not in an Index category yet.
Part of /property-management-software/security-deposit-alternatives/.