Vendor profile · verified 2026-10-04

Flamingo: Features, Pricing and Integrations

On the record

From the shared vendor database. Every fact carries its source and the date it was checked; anything not listed here is a question for the vendor.

Category
Resident Experience & Amenities, Community Engagement Apps
What it is · source · verified 2026-09-05
Branded resident engagement app for multifamily with a community social feed, event calendar and RSVPs, resident-to-resident messaging, surveys, rewards, amenity reservations and a concierge marketplace; 400,000+ units.
Pricing model · source · verified 2026-09-05
Published tiers: Free (Resident Event Marketplace), Engage from $300, Attract & Retain from $900, Simplify & Automate from $1,500 (billing unit not stated); 12-month term then month-to-month
PMS integrations · source · verified 2026-09-05
Yardi, RealPage, Entrata, Rent Manager
Property types and portfolio fit
Institutional Multifamily
Website
https://getflamingo.com/

Flamingo is a fully branded resident engagement app for multifamily, and the only multifamily vendor in the community engagement category that publishes tier pricing. Its resident-app page lists a community social feed, an event calendar with RSVPs, a searchable resident guide, resident-to-resident messaging, amenity reservations, maintenance requests, surveys, automated review requests, a rewards and loyalty program, fitness streaming and a concierge marketplace, and it claims 400,000 or more units. The line that sums up the pitch is its own: real community and engagement means providing a way for residents to connect virtually, and residents can discover and RSVP for events, get reminders and earn rewards for attending. The facts panel below is rendered from our vendor database with a source and verification date on each entry.

Who it fits

The database tags institutional multifamily. The product Flamingo describes is for an operator that wants one branded app across a portfolio with the feed and the events at the front and the operational features behind them, and that already runs one of the four property management systems it names. The rewards program and the automated review requests point at a marketing lead who is measured on renewals and online reviews, which is the buyer this category exists for.

An operator whose real need is to replace the PMS portal should read the resident experience and amenities guide first, because that is a different purchase judged on a different question. Flamingo’s page says the app integrates with existing resident portals, which suggests it expects to sit on top of one rather than replace it. Confirm that in the demo.

Pricing

Flamingo publishes four tiers on its pricing page. The free tier is the Resident Event Marketplace. Engage starts from $300, Attract & Retain from $900, and Simplify & Automate from $1,500. The page does not state the billing unit, so the first question is whether those figures are per community per month, per unit, or something else, and what the asterisk on each figure means. The term is 12 months, then month-to-month. Flamingo also takes a revenue share on the concierge marketplace and on renters insurance, so ask what the share is, what the resident pays, and whether the property sees any of it.

For a buyer comparing against quote-based vendors, the published floor is useful even without the unit. Ask each competitor to price the same feature set at the same community count and put the answers side by side with Flamingo’s tiers.

Integrations

The database lists Yardi, RealPage, Entrata and Rent Manager, sourced from the resident-app page. The same page names package systems and Dormakaba virtual keys, and says Flamingo can integrate with almost any system. Treat that last claim as an invitation to ask, not a fact. Ask which fields sync from the PMS, in which direction, whether a move-out closes the resident’s app account, and whether amenity reservations write to the same calendar the front desk uses. The Yardi integrations page and the Rent Manager integrations page list the other vendors on each system, which helps when the engagement decision runs alongside a payments or access decision.

Limitations and questions to ask

Adoption is the first question. Four hundred thousand units is a footprint, and the number a buyer needs is the percentage of eligible residents opening the app at a community like theirs, in month one and month twelve. Ask for it.

Moderation is the second. Flamingo’s page describes a social feed and resident-to-resident messaging and says nothing about who moderates either. Ask who can remove a post, whether posts can be held for review, and what the office sees in resident-to-resident messages.

The rewards program is the third. Ask what residents earn for attending an event, who funds it, and whether the vendor has a measured renewal difference between residents who earn rewards and residents who do not. Ask the same about the automated review requests: which review sites, how the request is timed, and what happens when a resident is unhappy.

The billing unit and the revenue share are the fourth. Do not sign a 12-month term without the per-unit or per-community figure in writing and the concierge and insurance share alongside it.

Alternatives

The list of community engagement vendors compares every vendor with the same facts. If the portfolio is Class A and the buyer wants digital signage, a lifestyle concierge and move-in inspections in the same app, ElevateOS is the closer comparison. If the operator wants to keep its existing resident app and add the community layer beside it, Cobu calls itself PMS-agnostic and partners with resident apps rather than replacing them. How the rest of the community engagement apps field compares is one page, vendor by vendor, with the same sourced facts. How Flamingo and Livly differ is on one page.

AI visibility

The current edition’s numbers sit in the Live from the Index section below, read from the run files each month; the prompts and sources behind them are on the row page it links.

Live from the Index, October 2026

Flamingo was named in 6% of runs across 2 engines that answered, rank 15 in RBPs . The prompts, sources and movement: Flamingo's RBPs row.

Flamingo was named in 63% of runs across 2 engines that answered, rank 1 in community engagement apps . The prompts, sources and movement: Flamingo's community engagement apps row.

Flamingo was named in 36% of runs across 2 engines that answered, rank 4 in resident experience platforms . The prompts, sources and movement: Flamingo's resident experience platforms row.

Flamingo was named in 4% of runs across 2 engines that answered, rank 19 in renters insurance programs . The prompts, sources and movement: Flamingo's renters insurance programs row.

Is this your company?

If you work at Flamingo and something here is out of date, claim the profile. Your corrections appear as a labeled vendor-supplied section with your verification date; the sourced facts and the Index numbers stay as measured.

Claim the Flamingo profile

Prefer a call? Contact.

Goes to ryan@webpossible.com with this page’s URL and your row attached. Never shared, never sold. See the privacy policy.

Part of /property-management-software/community-engagement-apps/.