Property Management Software · Multifamily Access Control

SmartRent vs PointCentral for Property Managers

SmartRent and PointCentral, fact by fact, from the shared vendor database. Each fact links to its source and shows the date it was checked.
FactSmartRentPointCentral
What it isSmart-home hub, locks, common-area access, and self-guided tours platform for multifamily; 890k units across 3,700 communities. sourceCellular-hub smart-property platform from Alarm.com for multifamily, BTR, and SFR. source
Pricing modelNot published; ask for the per-unit figure and the minimum.Not published; ask for the per-unit figure and the minimum.
PMS integrationsYardi, RealPage, Entrata, ResMan sourceYardi, RealPage, ResMan, AppFolio, Entrata source
SegmentsInstitutional Multifamily, Student Housing, Single-Family RentalSingle-Family Rental, Institutional Multifamily
Also known asAlloy, SightPlanAlarm.com PointCentral
Websitesmartrent.compointcentral.com
ProfileSmartRent reviewPointCentral review

SmartRent and PointCentral are the two smart-property hub platforms an operator compares when the lock is only part of the purchase and the thermostat, the leak sensor, and the vacant-unit tour ride along. Both put a hub in the unit and run locks and devices through it. The difference that decides most deals is what the hub talks to. SmartRent’s hub runs on Z-Wave and relies on the building’s connection. PointCentral’s hub is cellular and carries its own. The buyer is an institutional multifamily, build-to-rent, or single-family rental operator with enough doors that the connectivity choice is a capital decision. This page uses our vendor data and the research behind the multifamily access control guide.

Where each one comes from

SmartRent is a smart-home hub, locks, common-area access, and self-guided tours platform for multifamily. Its fourth-quarter 2025 results put it at 890,000 units across 3,700 communities. The hub runs on Z-Wave. The research notes that Yale locks sit inside SmartRent stacks, and SmartRent also sells hardware under its Alloy name and operations software under SightPlan. The vendor data places it in institutional multifamily, student housing, and single-family rental, and the research adds build-to-rent.

PointCentral is Alarm.com’s cellular-hub smart-property platform for multifamily, build-to-rent, and single-family rental. The research describes its path as single-family heritage moving into multifamily, build-to-rent, and short-term rental. Yale locks sit inside PointCentral stacks as well. The vendor data places it in single-family rental and institutional multifamily.

Both, then, are hub platforms running partner locks, and the same lock maker appears in both. The comparison is about the hub, the segments each one grew up in, and the PMS each one talks to.

Where each one fits

Connectivity first, because it is the reason this comparison exists. RemoteLock’s writing on lock connectivity, cited in the research, says Wi-Fi fails at scale in garden-style properties and that the real debate in multifamily is Z-Wave against cellular. Z-Wave, SmartRent’s architecture, keeps the lock traffic off Wi-Fi but still needs the hub to reach the internet through the building’s network. Cellular, PointCentral’s architecture, needs nothing from the building. A mid-rise with wired hallways and managed Wi-Fi can run either. A scattered single-family portfolio, a build-to-rent community of detached homes, or a garden property with no hallway is the case where a cellular hub avoids a network buildout. That is PointCentral’s heritage and the reason it is on this page.

PMS second. SmartRent publishes Yardi, RealPage, Entrata, and ResMan. PointCentral publishes Yardi, RealPage, ResMan, AppFolio, and Entrata. On Yardi, RealPage, Entrata, or ResMan, both have a listed integration. On AppFolio, PointCentral has one and SmartRent does not, which matters because AppFolio is common in exactly the single-family and small-portfolio segment where PointCentral started.

Segments third. Student housing appears in SmartRent’s data and not PointCentral’s. Single-family rental appears in both. The research puts short-term rental in PointCentral’s column, which is relevant to an operator with furnished or flexible-stay units. Self-guided tours appear in SmartRent’s description; ask PointCentral what it offers for touring a vacant unit without staff, because the research found self-guided tours are a routine part of this purchase.

The institutional multifamily and student housing pages cover the rest of the field for each segment.

Pricing

Neither publishes pricing. Our vendor data carries a source for every description and integration on both rows and no pricing figure for either.

The shape is the same for both, with one line item that differs. Hub per unit, lock per door, devices per unit, software per unit per month, installation by the vendor or an integrator. PointCentral’s cellular hub carries a data connection that someone pays for, so ask whether it is inside the software fee or a separate line. Ask both for the per-unit and minimum figures, the hardware cost per door and per hub, the term, and what the hub and locks do after the software contract ends.

What to ask each in a demo

Ask SmartRent about the network. What does the hub need from the building, who provides it, and what happens to lock operation, tours, and device reporting when the building’s connection drops. Ask for the wiring plan for your worst-connected property before you ask for the price. Ask whether the hub, the access platform, the tours product, and SightPlan are one sync to the PMS or several. Ask how the Alloy hardware and the Yale locks are supported differently.

Ask PointCentral about the cellular hub. Which carrier, what the signal survey looks like at a property with poor coverage, and what a hub does in a basement unit. Ask what happens during a carrier outage, and whether stored codes on the lock keep working without the hub. Ask what the Alarm.com relationship means for the resident app, for data, and for who answers support. Ask what the multifamily product adds over the single-family one, because the research describes a company that grew into multifamily rather than one that started there.

Ask both the questions the research says operators actually buy on. The NAA’s research found lockout resolution first, standardization second, and rekeying third, so ask how a lockout is resolved at 11 p.m., how one credential system runs across a mixed portfolio, and what a turn costs in credential work. Dead batteries are the top operational complaint, so ask how each hub reports a low battery and how far ahead. Ask how a resident with no phone gets in, because Washington’s ESSB 5937 requires a non-app key on request from January 2027 and New York City has Local Law 63.

What the Index shows

The AI Shortlist Index runs 25 prompts a month in this category across four engines and records which vendors appear. The 2026-09 export records zero runs for multifamily access control, so neither SmartRent nor PointCentral has yet been observed being named, cited, or ranked by any engine. The rows for SmartRent and PointCentral fill in with the first edition, and the prompts behind them are public in the prompt library. Our hypothesis is that SmartRent will be named on more prompts than PointCentral, because its unit count appears in the trade press the engines cite, and that PointCentral will do better on prompts that mention single-family or build-to-rent portfolios.

Either vendor, or any other in the category, can read how we measure that and what we do about it at AI visibility for proptech companies.

Which one fits

SmartRent fits an institutional multifamily or student housing operator on Yardi, RealPage, Entrata, or ResMan with buildings that have hallways and a managed network, especially one that wants self-guided tours from the same platform. Buy it with the network plan for your worst-wired property in writing.

PointCentral fits a single-family, build-to-rent, or garden-style operator, on AppFolio or any of the four systems both vendors share, that does not want to build a network to run locks. Buy it with the cellular data cost and the carrier outage behavior in the contract.

The DOOR and SmartRent comparison covers the proprietary-lock question this page skips, and the SmartRent alternatives page covers the other ten vendors. The profiles for SmartRent and PointCentral carry the facts panel and the dated sources.

One more question for both demos, because it decides the retrofit budget before either platform is priced: how many unit doors are mortise rather than cylindrical, and which lock models on the vendor’s compatibility list fit each. A garden-style property with a mix of both can end up with two lock SKUs, two battery schedules and two training sheets for the maintenance team, whichever hub wins.

What the AI Shortlist Index shows

In the September 2026 edition, across 25 recorded runs, the engines named ButterflyMX (83%), Salto (76%) and Brivo (75%).

The live ranking, source map and every vendor row: Multifamily Access Control in the AI Shortlist Index.

Part of the Multifamily Access Control guide.